Qiang Wang vs Jodie Anna Burrage Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Wang vs J. Anna Burrage

Qiang Wang
CHN
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
26
1.72m
Height
-
826
C. Rank
149
12
Best Rank
85
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.9M
Career Money
$610.5K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Jodie Anna Burrage
GBR
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
26
1.72m
Height
-
826
C. Rank
149
12
Best Rank
85
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.9M
Career Money
$610.5K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Burrage
They have played 3 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 2 and Jodie Anna Burrage winning 1. The last match between Qiang Wang and Jodie Anna Burrage was at the Ilkley, 15-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Qiang Wang getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Wang | 1 |
Burrage | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Ilkley(06-15-15)
Qiang Wang
6
5
6
Jodie Anna Burrage
2
7
2
Q. Wang vs J. A. Burrage H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$3,853,637 | Career Prize Money | $610,536 |
58.79% (418-293) | Career Total W/L | 57.24% (261-195) |
1 | Grass | 0 |
17 | Titles | 6 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (4-8) |
Q. Wang vs J. A. Burrage Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qiang Wang has won 39.13% of points on their second serve, while Jodie Anna Burrage has won 38.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qiang Wang, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jodie Anna Burrage has won 49.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.86% and 30.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qiang Wang has saved 50.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jodie Anna Burrage has saved 51.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qiang Wang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/3), with Jodie Anna Burrage winning 48.33% (W/L 29/31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qiang Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 314/195), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/36). Jodie Anna Burrage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 66/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 7/16).
- Player level: In the last year, Qiang Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/2), where as Jodie Anna Burrage has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.86% of matches (W/L 22/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Qiang Wang winning 1 times and Jodie Anna Burrage being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 2 and Jodie Anna Burrage winning 1.
- The last match between Qiang Wang and Jodie Anna Burrage was at the Ilkley, 15-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Qiang Wang getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qiang Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 355.67 while Jodie Anna Burrage has played against players with an average rank of 217.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qiang Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jodie Anna Burrage has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qiang Wang has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jodie Anna Burrage has converted 37.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Qiang Wang vs Jodie Anna Burrage Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Wang vs J. A. Burrage H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 11 |
0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wang 39%, Burrage 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wang 50%, Burrage 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Wang 50%, Burrage 56%.
Q. Wang Recent Matches Played
J. A. Burrage Recent Matches Played

Q. Wang vs J. A. Burrage Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.04% (418/290) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.24% (261/195) |
58.29% (942/674) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.95% (598/434) |
53.43% (7813/6811) | Games Win/Loss | 53.33% (5088/4453) |
61.69% (314/195) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.07% (161/107) |
49.30% (35/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.43% (7/16) |
54.55% (48/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.61% (72/43) |
52.50% (21/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.00% (21/29) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
1077 | Aces Total | 1722 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
997 | Total Double Faults | 1550 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:25:24 |
531.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.71 |
63% (18169/29059) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16786/28600) |
63% (11484/18169) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11250/16786) |
47% (5157/10884) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5440/11814) |
47% (1755/3715) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1596/3429) |
45% (13285/29336) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12760/28746) |
50.75% (34/33) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (7/14) |
53.01% (44/39) | Masters W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
73.08% (19/7) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
51.06% (96/92) | Main Tour W/L | 44.12% (30/38) |
64.50% (198/109) | Challenger W/L | 61.09% (168/107) |
72.97% (27/10) | Futures W/L | 67.50% (54/26) |
59% (412/694) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (257/448) |
50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
49% (61/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (54/105) |
48% (95/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (48/127) |
86% (434/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (287/233) |
14% (434/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (287/52) |
16% (274/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (169/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 PM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
2.68
W2
1.43
06:00 PM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.77
W2
1.97
11:00 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.38
W2
2.875
11:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.9
W2
1.9
08:00 AM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.87
W2
1.87
12:00 PM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.74
W2
2.01
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
13:30
H2H 4-2
11:30
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 2-1
09:00
H2H 2-0
11:00
H2H 0-2
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Cali Challenger
Colombia
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Roanne Challenger
France
Shenzhen Challenger
China
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Castellon
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Lexington
United States
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Offenbach
Germany
M15 Pontevedra
Spain
M15 Rodez
France
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Villers-les-Nancy
France
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy